The NFL and Rush’s rights

I never really took Rush Limbaugh’s bid to be a part-owner of a National Football League team very seriously.

That’s partly because I wasn’t sure that he was ever serious about it, except as a means of gaining publicity for himself. The conservative radio host is nothing if not a savvy self-promoter. And I was more sure that the NFL, which is nothing if not image-conscious and averse to controversy, would never let him in.

Like his abortive stint as an ESPN pro football commentator back in 2003, Limbaugh’s membership in a group trying to buy the St. Louis Rams football team was over just about before it began.

According to news reports, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell, in addition to at least one team owner, expressed concerns about Limbaugh’s possible involvement and “polarizing” past comments about the league at a special meeting on the topic.

Limbaugh, naturally, made this the lead topic of his show on Thursday morning, blaming the usual suspects — the Obama administration, Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson, and liberal sportswriters (an odd notion to me) — for his flameout as a prospective NFL owner.

According to an Associated Press report, Limbaugh said on his broadcast that he was targeted by the NFL Players Association and its leader DeMaurice Smith (whom he called an “Obama-ite”), in advance of upcoming collective bargaining negotiations.

I have a couple of reactions to all of that, as I’m sure I can anticipate what his outraged defenders are going to say. Of course, Rush Limbaugh has the Constititutional right to say pretty much whatever he wants to say on the radio. He had that right yesterday and will have it tomorrow.

He does not have a Constitutional right to be an owner of an NFL team — never had that and never will. The group of NFL team owners is essentially a private club — one I’ve never really pictured as being populated by flaming liberals. (See this article from Bloomberg News as evidence.) And they can let in or exclude anyone they want, subject to anti-trust laws. That’s a business decision and it’s obvious the club decided that Rush was going to be bad for business.

So if he wants to blame anything for the demise of his NFL dreams, he should blame the free market. And there’s just a little bit of irony in that, isn’t there?

Advertisements

About theoldperfessor

I'm a college professor, teaching journalism and public relations classes at a small private university, and a freelance writer.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The NFL and Rush’s rights

  1. Paul says:

    It seems to me that all the negative vibes this blowhard (Rush Hudson Limbaugh A.KA. Jeff Christie) has been spewing over these many years has come back to blow back on his face (A classic “Blow Back”). He always tries to give off the airs that he can have anything he wants but as we all witness those with more money and influence tossed him aside like sack of potatoes and the ultimate insult was that it was done in public (money don’t buy you everything butterball). Now of course he blames everyone else (Michael J. Fox, Perez Hilton, Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Obama, Oprah Winfrey, Sonia Sotomayor, Hillary Clinton, Olympia Snowe, ESPN, NFL, the media, basically people of color, women and gays) when of course all you have to do is listen to his show and plainly hear his daily prejudices filled sermons. So NFL, I salute you decision, job well done. And to the whaling cry baby perched on his self made pedestal, quit your whining it was your own fault. Don’t we all feel better?

  2. Kristi says:

    I have to say that this whole ordeal was quite amusing and keeps getting better with comments I read from Rush in an article today on Yahoo! News where he basically states that the condition of America hangs in the balance because of the left-wingers' outspokenness and ability to keep him from being a partial professional sports team owner. Now, it amused me even more to step back and "hear" what the article was saying…and that was this:Rush is blaming his political opposition with an invalid argument which just goes to fuel the partisan divide this country has. He's not interested in bringing people together by his actions, but rather obviously wants to continue to divide and (unsuccessfully) conquer, as well as incite blinded devotees who would rather have Rush tell them how to feel than to actually think on their own.Commenter Paul put it best: "NFL, I salute your decision, job well done." I concur.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s